{"id":255848,"date":"2026-07-13T14:21:18","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T11:21:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/bbc-science-focus-magazine-march-2026-bbc-science-focus-magazine-1\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T14:21:18","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T11:21:18","slug":"bbc-science-focus-magazine-march-2026-bbc-science-focus-magazine-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/bbc-science-focus-magazine-march-2026-bbc-science-focus-magazine-1\/","title":{"rendered":"BBC Science Focus Magazine – March 2026 – BBC Science Focus Magazine (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"<\/figure>\n
\n

Stephen Hawking spent much of his life pulling at a thread, one that had been swallowed by a black hole. He was interested in what happened to material once it passed a black hole\u2019s event horizon \u2013 the point of no return, where gravity crushes anything that crosses it into an infinitesimally small point in space. If you fell in, your atoms would become part of this cosmic monster and reside there until the end of time. Hawking\u2019s maths suggested something else, though.<\/p>\n

According to his calculations, black holes don\u2019t last until the end of time. In fact, our latest interpretation of the Universe, based on quantum mechanics, suggests that over time a black hole would\u2026 fizz away: its particles evaporating off over eons until one final, massive burst of energy.<\/p>\n

Why does this matter? Well, until this point, the prevailing idea in physics was that nothing is ever really destroyed. If we could somehow fish your atoms out of a black hole, and invent a machine that knew where to put them, we could, in theory, rebuild you.<\/p>\n

The death of a black hole, and the ultimate end of everything within it, seemed to violate this rule. Hawking had spotted a crack in our model of the Universe. The resolution to this problem that he settled on, after many intellectual battles with other theoretical physicists, was the \u2018holographic principle\u2019 (an idea first proposed by physicists Gerard \u2018t Hooft and Leonard Susskind). It\u2019s a headscratcher of an idea that suggests the Universe is actually a projection \u2013 a 3D reality derived from 2D information.<\/p>\n

And, that\u2019s where I\u2019ll stop and let Thomas Hertog take over, on p64. Hertog was one of Hawking\u2019s closest science collaborators and he thinks that we\u2019re close to a discovery that will let us see Hawking\u2019s maths play out in the real world. A discovery that could finally move us closer to a single, unified theory of everything. Daniel Bennett, Editor O N T H E B B C T H I S M O N T H .<\/p>\n

. . WANT MORE? FOLLOW SCIENCEFOCUS ON FACEBOOK X (FORMERLY TWITTER) PINTEREST INSTAGRAM *UK calls will cost the same as other standard fixed line numbers (starting 01 or 02) and are included as part of any inclusive or free minutes allowances (if offered by your phone tariff). Outside of free call packages call charges from mobile phones will cost between 3p and 55p per minute. Lines are open Mon to Fri 9am\u20135pm. If calling from overseas, please call +44 1604 973721.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is a short excerpt from the opening of “” by Unknown, quoted for review and introduction purposes. All rights belong to the copyright holders.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n