{"id":258140,"date":"2026-07-13T16:05:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T13:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/death-object-exploding-the-nuclear-weapons-hoax-akio-nakatani-1\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T16:05:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T13:05:00","slug":"death-object-exploding-the-nuclear-weapons-hoax-akio-nakatani-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/death-object-exploding-the-nuclear-weapons-hoax-akio-nakatani-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Death Object Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax – Akio Nakatani (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"<\/figure>\n

Baker was detonated 90 feet (27 m) underwater, halfway to the bottom in water 180 feet (55 m) deep. (Wikipedia) Baker\u2019s yield is estimated at 23 kilotons, vs. about 20+\/- kilotons TNT equivalent for Trinity. So Baker wasn\u2019t all that wildly more powerful than Gadget. The Baker device was a Fat Man plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapon similar to that dropped on Nagasaki.<\/p>\n

Here was the supposed effect: The result created a shallow crater on the seafloor 30 feet deep and nearly 2,000 feet wide. (Atomic Heritage Foundation) If a 30-foot crater depth is \u2018shallow\u2019, what word applies to the Trinity test\u2019s 5- foot crater? Considering that both devices were nearly the same height above the surface (100 feet above desert for Gadget, 90 feet above sea floor for Baker), this discrepancy in crater depths is interesting.<\/p>\n

Perhaps that\u2019s due to the effect of water buffering (as a less compressive medium than air – but that could have functioned equally well to protect the sea floor). It\u2019s an interesting research problem. It\u2019s possible that among all the details necessary to arrange for a good Trinity display, the crater size issue was overlooked. Or it may have been difficult to dip out a good size crater within the time and logistical parameters required by other parts of the operation (tower construction etc.) By the time of Baker\u2019 perhaps they were determined to fluff up this previously overlooked element of a good nuclear show with a more exaggerated report.<\/p>\n

September 1945: General Groves, Oppenheimer and other scientists inspecting Ground Zero. Trinitite Trinitite, also known as atomsite or Alamogordo glass, is the glassy residue left on the desert floor after the plutonium-based Trinity nuclear bomb test on July 16, 1945, near Alamogordo, New Mexico.<\/p>\n

\n

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. Print ISBN 978-1-5455-1683-6 Table of Contents Prologue Introduction: SATAN 2 Fire Last Time Fire This Time Born Secret Enemy At the Gates Geek-Out The Nuclear Secret That Dare Not Speak Its Name Burn the Sky!<\/p>\n

Virtual Manhattan Project Checkmate The Secret Money Shot: TRINITY Something Like an Actor Unit Testing? Jumbo 100-Ton Test I Am Become Death Trinitite Fool Me Twice: Japan 1945 Hiroshima Trickery is the Way of War Nagasaki Downfall The Mike of the Beast H-Bomb Lookout Mountain Studios Something Fishy: Bikini Photo and Film Checklist Conspiracy! Fire No Time: Falsification Acknowledgements Bibliography About the Author Prologue \u5175\u8005\u8a6d\u9053\u4e5f Trickery is the way of war. Sunzi The process of atomic fission produces all kinds of elemental \u201cstuff\u201d: Plutonium and uranium split unevenly.<\/p>\n

It is rare that they split into two equal parts, and in the explosion their fragments become every element below them. Anything you can name is there \u2013 molybdenum, barium, iodine, cesium, strontium, antimony, hydrogen, tin, copper, carbon, iron, silver, and gold. (\u2018The Curve of Binding Energy\u2019 John McPhee) In that eclectic spirit, this book can be read as a critical assembly of many different elemental traces: primer (Nuclear Bombs for Dummies), history, polemic, prophecy, comedy or tragedy.<\/p>\n

If you think this topic\u2019s gray and gloomy gravitas rules out any of those, watch Stanley Kubrick\u2019s masterpiece of atomic humor, Dr. Stranglove, and think again. If you\u2019re already an atomic skeptic, this book will serve as a handy reference compendium of familiar evidence coherently organized. If you\u2019re a firm believer in the reality of nuclear weapons, this book could make you think twice.<\/p>\n

If you haven\u2019t considered the subject one way or the other, I can promise you that by the end of this book you\u2019ll have received a larger dosage of nuclear knowledge with less strain and boredom than you\u2019d have thought humanly possible. If I get you thinking more seriously about the implications of atomic weaponry, then as far as I\u2019m concerned \u2013 result!<\/p>\n

Keep one thing in mind as you read. In addition to all the junky byproducts of a nuclear blast listed above, there\u2019s one other: photon emissions. That\u2019s visible light and it\u2019s what I hope this book can radiate. I think you\u2019ll find it both enlightening (like a stimulating course lecture) and entertaining (like a horror movie). How could a topic so unthinkably ghastly be entertaining?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is a short excerpt from the opening of “” by Unknown, quoted for review and introduction purposes. All rights belong to the copyright holders.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n