{"id":261078,"date":"2026-07-13T18:07:04","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T15:07:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/foundations-of-natural-right-fichte\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T18:07:04","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T15:07:04","slug":"foundations-of-natural-right-fichte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1kitap1.com\/en\/foundations-of-natural-right-fichte\/","title":{"rendered":"Foundations Of Natural Right – Fichte"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"<\/figure>\n

In this case the external law of right exists, but [149] can be applied only within a commonwealth. Thus, natural right disappears. But what we lose on the one side, we recover on the other, and at a profit; lor the state itself becomes the human being\u2019s natural condition, and its laws ought to be nothing other than natural right realized.)<\/p>\n

\u00a716 Deduction of the concept of a commonwealth The problem that we were left with, that we could not solve, and that we hope to solve through the concept of a commonwealth, was this: how to bring about a power that can enforce right (or what all persons necessarily will) amongst persons who live together. (I) The object of their common will is mutual security; but since, as we have assumed, persons are motivated only by self-love and not morality, each individual wills the security of the other only because he wills his own, willing the other\u2019s security is subordinate to willing one\u2019s own; no one is concerned whether the other is secure against oneself, except to the extent that the other\u2019s security is the condition of one\u2019s own security against the other.<\/p>\n

We can express this briefly in the following formula: Each person subordinates the common end to his private end. (This is what the law of coercion reckons with; [151] by linking the welfare of each in reality to the security of the welfare of all others, the law of coercion is meant to produce this reciprocity, this necessary conjunction of the two ends, in the will of each individual.)<\/p>\n

The will of a power that exercises the right of coercion cannot be constituted in this way; for, since the private will is subordinated to the common will only through coercive power, and since this coercive power is supposed to be superior to all other power, the private will of the coercive power could be subordinated to the common will only by its own power, which is absurd. Therefore, the coercive power\u2019s private Foundations of natural right will must already be subordinated to and in harmony with the common will, and there must be no need to bring about such subordination and harmony, i.e.<\/p>\n

the private will of the coercive power and the common will must be one and the same; the common will itself, and nothing else, must be the private will of the coercive power, and this power must have no other particular and private will at all.<\/p>\n

\n

Professor of Philosophy at University College Cork The main objective of Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy is to expand the range, variety and quality of texts in the history of philosophy which are available in English. The series includes texts by familiar names (such as Descartes and Kant) and also by less well-known authors. Wherever possible, texts are published in complete and unabridged form, and translations are specially commis\u00ac sioned for the series.<\/p>\n

Each volume contains a critical introduction together with a guide to further reading and any necessary glossaries and textual apparatus. The volumes are designed for student use at undergraduate and postgraduate level and will be of interest not only to students of philosophy, but also to a wider audience of readers in the history of science, the history of theology and the history of ideas. For a list of titles published in the series, please see end of book.<\/p>\n

J. G. FICHTE Foundations of Natural Right According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre EDITED BY FREDERICK NEUHOUSER Cornell University TRANSLATED BY MICHAEL BAUR Fordham University \u25a0ftomas J. Bata Library TRENT uNi vcRSiH PETERBOROUGH. ONTARIO CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS PUBLISHED BY THE PRESS SYNDICATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain \u00a9 Cambridge University Press 2000 The book is in copyright.<\/p>\n

Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Ehrhardt 11\/i3pt System 3b2 [ce] A catalogue record for this hook is available from the British Library Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, 1762-1814. [Grundlage des Naturrechts nach Principien der Wissenschaftslehre. English] Foundations of natural right \/ J.<\/p>\n

G. Fichte; edited by Frederick Neuhouser; translated by Michael Baur. p. cm. – (Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN o 521 57591 5 (hardback) – ISBN o 521 57301 7 (paperback) 1. Natural law. 2. Political science. 3. State, The. 1. Neuhouser, Frederick. 11. Title, m. Series.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This is a short excerpt from the opening of “” by Unknown, quoted for review and introduction purposes. All rights belong to the copyright holders.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
\n

Table of Contents<\/p>\nToggle<\/span><\/path><\/svg><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n